Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 45, Supplement 3 , Pages S305-S312, May 2001

Assessment of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Clinical Trials of Glaucoma Neuroprotection

Glaucoma Center, University of California–San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

Abstract 

Assessment of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) is appealing for use in clinical trials of glaucoma neuroprotection, as it is directly correlated with loss of ganglion cells, which is assumed to be a primary event in glaucomatous damage. Qualitative assessment of the RNFL includes ophthalmoscopy, color stereophotography, and red-free monochromatic photography. In contrast, confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO), scanning laser polarimetry (GDx), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and retinal thickness analysis (RTA) objectively and quantitatively measure the RNFL thickness. These latter techniques are still in evolution. Continuing meticulous objective validation is necessary to assess the usefulness and limitations of these powerful tools. Nevertheless, there are excellent prospects for using longitudinal assessment of the RNFL in clinical trials of glaucoma neuroprotection.

Keywords:  clinical trials, ganglion cell, glaucoma, glaucoma progression, neuroprotection, retinal nerve fiber layer, outcome measures

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any product or concept discussed in this article.

PII: S0039-6257(01)00202-8

Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 45, Supplement 3 , Pages S305-S312, May 2001