Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 46, Issue 3 , Pages 269-274 , November 2001

Dynamic Retinoscopy: The Missing Data

  • David G Hunter, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint address: David G. Hunter, MD, PhD, Wilmer 233, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287-9028

References 

  1. Cregg M, Woodhouse JM, Pakeman VH, et al.  Accommodation and refractive error in children with Down syndrome (cross-sectional and longitudinal studies). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:55–63
  2. del Pilar Cacho M, Garcia-Munoz A, Garcia-Bernabeu JR, Lopez A. Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:650–655
  3. Guyton DL, OConnor GM. Dynamic retinoscopy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1991;2:78–80
  4. Haugen OH, Hovding G. Strabismus and binocular function in children with Down syndrome. A population-based, longitudinal study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79:133–139
  5. Haynes H, White BL, Held R. Visual accommodation in human infants. Science. 1965;148:528–530
  6. Jackson E. In: Skiascopy and its practical application to the study of refraction. Philadelphia: Edwards and Docker; 1895;p. 86–88
  7. Jackson TW, Goss DA. Variation and correlation of clinical tests of accommodative function in a sample of school-age children. J Am Optom Assoc. 1991;62:857–866
  8. Leat SJ. Reduced accommodation in children with cerebral palsy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:385–390
  9. Mohindra I, Held R, Gwiazda J, Brill J. Astigmatism in infants. Science. 1978;202:329–331
  10. Rosenfield M, Portello JK, Blustein GH, Jang C. Comparison of clinical techniques to assess the near accommodative response. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:382–388
  11. Tondel G, Horner D, Bradley A. Infant accommodation dynamics measured by eccentric videorefraction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2075;[Abstract]

PII: S0039-6257(01)00260-0

Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 46, Issue 3 , Pages 269-274 , November 2001

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution