Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 47, Issue 3 , Pages 215-238, May 2002

Primary Anti-Phospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS)

Current Concepts

  • Omar M Durrani, FRCS

      Affiliations

    • Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Division of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint address: Omar M Durrani, Birmingham & Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital NHS Trust, Dudley Road, Birmingham B18 7QU, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Caroline Gordon, MD, FRCP

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rheumatology, Division of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Philip I Murray, FRCOphth, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Division of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

ROBERT WEINBERG, EDITOR

Abstract 

Primary anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thrombophilic state characterized by recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis, recurrent pregnancy loss, and the presence of circulating anti-phospholipid antibodies that may be responsible for thrombophilia and pregnancy morbidity. Ophthalmologic features are present in 15–88% of the patients with primary APS, thus ophthalmologists are one of the first physicians to whom the patient will present. An accurate diagnosis may save the patient from recurrent, potentially life-threatening thrombosis. In the U.S.A., an estimated 35,000 new cases of APS-related venous thrombosis occur each year in a population that is several decades younger than the patient population typically affected by thrombosis. Clinical features, such as chorea, transverse myelitis, cardiac valvular lesions, and accelerated atherosclerosis, are hypothesized to be due to a direct tissue-antibody interaction and cannot be explained purely by thrombosis. The use of recently proposed, well-defined diagnostic criteria, and better standardization of laboratory assays for the anti-phospholipid antibodies should help enable epidemiological surveys to establish the prevalence of these antibodies in patients with thrombosis and in the general population. Diagnosis of APS should be considered in all patients with recurrent systemic or ocular thrombosis in the absence of known risk factors. Several well-designed prospective studies show an increased risk of thrombosis in the presence of medium to high antibody level. With ocular involvement in as many as 88% of APS patients, an ophthalmic assessment should be an integral part of the clinical work-up of any patient with suspected or confirmed APS. The presence of isolated ocular thrombophilia with persistently elevated anti-phospholipid antibodies or lupus coagulant should confirm the diagnosis of APS. Management of these patients must be a multi-disciplinary effort with either a rheumatologist or a hematologist having the overall responsibility for coordinating treatment and monitoring the patient's immune status and anticoagulation. Treatment of isolated ocular thrombophilia in the presence of moderate to high titers of antiphospholipid antibodies should be on the same principles as patients with APS to prevent recurrent ocular or cerebral thrombosis.

Keywords:  anti-B2-glycoprotein I antibodies, anti-cardiolipin antibodies, anti-phospholipid antibodies, anti-phospholipid syndrome, lupus anticoagulant, thrombosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0039-6257(02)00289-8

Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 47, Issue 3 , Pages 215-238, May 2002