The Effect of Latanoprost Compared with Timolol in African-American, Asian, Caucasian, and Mexican Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensive Patients
Abstract
Objective: To study the intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction of latanoprost or timolol in a heterogeneous global population. Methods: A total of 1,389 glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients treated with 0.005% latanoprost once daily (n = 737) or 0.5% timolol twice daily (n = 652) from eight clinical trials were included. After 3–6 months of treatment, the IOP was analyzed with use of analysis of covariance. Results: Latanoprost or timolol gave statistically significant mean diurnal IOP reduction in the African-American, Asian, Caucasian, and Mexican patients, latanoprost with 7.9 mm Hg and timolol with 6.4 mm Hg. The Asian and Mexican patients showed a larger difference in mean diurnal IOP reduction with use of the two drugs (range 1.8–3.1 mm Hg) than the European and U.S. patients (range 0.6–1.7 mm Hg, p = 0.030). Latanoprost produced similar mean diurnal IOP reduction in patients with and without previous glaucoma treatment other than prostaglandins. Conclusion: Latanoprost or timolol statistically significantly reduced the mean diurnal IOP in a heterogenous global population in eight clinical trials. The degree of reduction appeared to be clinically useful. The greatest difference in the mean diurnal IOP-lowering effect of latanoprost or timolol was observed in Mexican and Asian clinical trials.
Keywords: intraocular pressure, latanoprost, ocular hypertension, open-angle glaucoma, prostaglandin, timolol
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported by Pharmacia Corporation, Peapack, New Jersey, USA. Katarina Hedman is employed by Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden, and Lill-Inger Larsson is employed by Pharmacia Corporation, Stockholm, Sweden. Neither of the authors reported any proprietary interest in the development or marketing of drugs used in the clinical trials subject to this article. Presented in part at the European Society of Ophthalmology meeting in Stockholm, Sweden, June 1999 and the 6th Congress of the European Glaucoma Society, UK, London, June 2000. The authors wish to thank Adam Taube, PhD, Department of Information Science–Statistics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Albert Alm, MD, Department of Neuroscience–Ophthalmology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; and Berith Ahlsten, BSc, Hospital Pharmacy, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, for valuable contributions.
PII: S0039-6257(02)00310-7
© 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
