Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 92-106, January 2003

Motion Perception in Glaucoma Patients:

A Review

  • Noor Shabana, DOMS

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint address: Dr Noor Shabana, SERI/Singapore National Eye Centre, 11, Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751, Singapore
    • Department of Ophthalmology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    • Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • ,
  • Valérie Cornilleau Pérès, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
    • Image Processing and Application Laboratory, CNRS, Singapore, Singapore
  • ,
  • Andrew Carkeet, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • ,
  • Paul T.K Chew, FRCSE

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ophthalmology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Abstract 

Most of the histopathological and psychophysical studies in glaucoma reveal a preferential damage to the magnocellular (M) pathway although a few of them support a damage to the parvocellular (P) pathway as well. In glaucoma, the visual fields are usually evaluated by conventional perimetry. However, it has been demonstrated that 20–40% of ganglion cells are lost before field defects are detected using conventional perimetry. Therefore, new psychophysical tests have recently been designed in order to specifically isolate and evaluate the visual mechanisms that are impaired at the early stages of glaucoma. In this context, several authors have addressed the issue of motion perception under the hypothesis of a predominant damage of the M pathway in glaucoma, and that motion perception is mediated mainly by M pathway. The results of these studies depict a large variation in the percentage of patients showing anomalous motion perception. Overall, motion thresholds are elevated in both glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients as compared to control subjects, irrespective of the stimulus size and eccentricity. The test which discriminates best between patients and normal subjects is motion perimetry. The visual field defects in glaucoma patients identified by conventional perimetry and motion perimetry are similar, but the sizes of the defects are usually larger with motion perimetry. However, motion tests in central vision have no correlation with visual field defect on conventional perimetry. In glaucoma, loss of performance on motion perception tests does not necessarily support the existence of a specific deficit in the M pathway, because some behavioral studies suggest that the P pathway can also mediate motion perception. It is also difficult to conclude that motion perception is specifically affected in glaucoma because most of these studies do not yield a comparison with other visual functions. Despite these difficulties, localized motion perception tests at eccentricities of more than 15° can be considered as a promising diagnostic tool.

Keywords:  frequency doubling technology perimetry, ganglion cell death, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, motion perception, motion perimetry, visual pathways

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0039-6257(02)00401-0

Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 92-106, January 2003