Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 49, Issue 2 , Pages 197-213, March 2004

Determinants of eye drop size

  • Luc Van Santvliet, PhD
  • ,
  • Annick Ludwig, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint address: Prof. Dr. Annick Ludwig, University of Antwerp (U.I.A.), Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium.

University of Antwerp (U.I.A.), Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Antwerp, Belgium

JOEL MINDEL, EDITOR

Abstract 

Ophthalmic solutions are available for multidose or single-dose administration in a wide variety of glass and plastic dropper bottles which deliver drops with a volume between 25 and 70 μl. From a biopharmaceutical and economic point of view, however, smaller volumes of 5 to 15 μl should be instilled. In this review, the technical, pharmaceutical, and therapeutic aspects of eye drop formation and delivery are presented. The different types of containers are described and the determinants of eye drop size are discussed, such as the design and physical characteristics of the dropper tip and bottle, the physico-chemical properties of the solution, and the manner in which the patient dispenses the drops. Preferred and alternative instillation techniques and aids to facilitate the administration of eye drops by elderly patients are described.

Keywords:  administration aids, drop dispensing, eye drop administration, eye drop size, ophthalmic solutions, packaging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors reported no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

PII: S0039-6257(03)00183-8

doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2003.12.009

Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 49, Issue 2 , Pages 197-213, March 2004