Computer and World Wide Web Accessibility by Visually Disabled Patients: Problems and Solutions

References 

1. Altman RB. Informatics in the care of patients: ten notable challenges. West J Med. 1997;166:118–122
   • MEDLINE
2. American Foundation for the Blind . Statistics and sources for professionals. New York: American Foundation for the Blind; 2000;
3. Blanck PD, Sandler LA. ADA Title III and the Internet: technology and civil rights. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep. 2000;24:855–859
   • MEDLINE
4. Boulton LM. A clinical evaluation of equipment which allows the partially sighted and blind to access computer-based information. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol. 1989;17:87–93
5. Boulton LM. Computer hardware and software to assist the visually impaired and blind. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol. 1993;21:7–14
6. Brown C. Assistive technology computers and personal with disabilities. Commun ACM. 1992;35:36–45
7. Brown GC. Vision and quality-of-life. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999;97:473–511
   • MEDLINE
8. Buyukkokten O, Garcia-Molina H, Paepcke A. Seeing the whole in parts: text summarization for web browsing on handheld devices, in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: ACM Press; 2001;pp 652
9. Chiang MF, Starren J, et al: Evaluation of consumer health website accessibility by users with sensory and physical disabilities. Medinfo 11(pt2): 1128–32, 2004
10. Chisolm W, Vanderheiden G, Jacobs I. Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. Interactions. 2001;8:35–54
11. Christian K, Kules B, Shneiderman B, Youssef A. A comparison of voice controlled and mouse controlled web browsing, in Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies. New York: ACM Press; 2000;pp 72–9
12. Devine EG, Gaehde SA, Curtis AC. Comparative evaluation of three continuous speech recognition software packages in the generation of medical reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:462–468
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
13. Faye EE. Maintaining visual functions in the elderly. Bull NY Acad Med. 1984;60:987–993
14. Finn A, Kushmerick N, Smyth B. Fact or fiction: content classification for digital libraries, in Proceedings of the Second DELOS Network of Excellence Workshop on Personalisation and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries. Sophia-Antipolis Cedex, France: ERCIM; 2001;pp 2–6
15. Fraser J, Gutwin C. A framework of assistive pointers for low vision users, in Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies. New York: ACM Press; 2000;pp 9–16
16. Gerber E, Kirchner C, et al. Who's surfing? Internet access and computer use by visually impaired youths and adults. J Vis Impair Blind. 2001;95:176–181
17. Gunderson J. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): human computer interaction and people with disabilities, in Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press; 1994;pp 381–2
18. Gupta S, Kaiser G, Neistadt D, Grimm P. Adapting content to mobile devices: DOM-based content extraction of HTML documents, in Proceedings of Twelfth International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: ACM Press; 2003;pp 207–14
19. Henricks WH, Roumina K, Skilton BE, et al. The utility and cost effectiveness of voice recognition technology in surgical pathology. Mod Pathol. 2002;15:565–571
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
20. Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco . Chronic Care in America: A 21st Century Challenge. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 1996;
21. Jacko JA, Sears A. Designing interfaces for an overlooked user group: considering the visual profiles of partially sighted users, in Proceedings of the Third International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies. New York: ACM Press; 1998;pp 75–7
22. Jacko JA, Dixon MA, Rosa RH, et al. Visual profiles: a critical component of universal access, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press; 1999;pp 330–7
23. Jacko JA, Barreto AB, Marmet GJ, et al. Low vision: The role of visual acuity in the efficiency of cursor movement, in Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies. New York: ACM Press; 2000;pp 1–8
24. Kline RL, Glinert EP. Improving GUI accessibility for people with low vision, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press; 1995;pp 114–21
25. Kraut JA, McCabe CP. The problem of low vision. In:  Albert DA,  Jakobiec FA editor. Principles and Practices of Ophthalmology. ed 1. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993;p. 3664–3683
26. Ladner RE. Computer accessibility for federal workers with disabilities: it's the law. Commun ACM. 1989;32:952–956
27. Laux LF, McNally PR, Paciello MG, Vanderheiden GC. Designing the World Wide Web for people with disabilities: a user centered design approach, in Proceedings of the Second Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies. New York: ACM Press; 1996;pp 94–101
28. Licklider JCR, Clark W. On-line man computer communication. Proc Spring Joint Computer Conf. 1962;21:113–128
29. Paciello MG. Web Accessibility for People with Disabilities. CMP Books; 2000;
30. Roberts LG. Multiple computer networks and inter-computer communications, in Proceedings of the First ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles. New York: ACM Press; 1967;pp 3.1–3.6
31. Scott IU, Schein OD, West S, et al. Functional status and quality of life measurement among ophthalmic patients. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:329–335
    • MEDLINE
32. Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Jacko JA. Impact of visual function on computer task accuracy and reaction time in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:350–357
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (122 KB)
    • CrossRef
33. Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Jacko JA. Impact of graphical user interface screen features on computer task accuracy and speed in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:857–862
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (108 KB)
    • CrossRef
34. Shneiderman B. Universal usability: pushing human-computer interaction research to empower every citizen. Commun ACM. 2000;43:84–91
35. Shoemaker JA. Vision Problems in the US: Prevalence of Adult Vision Impairment and Age-Related eye Diseases in America. Bethesda, MD: National Eye Institute; 2002;
36. Sierkowski B. Achieving web accessibility, in Proceedings of the 30th annual ACM SIGUCCS Fall Conference on User Services Conference. New York: ACM Press; 2002;pp 288–91
37. Sullivan T, Matson R. Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the web's most popular sites, in Proceedings of the Conference on Universal Usability. New York: ACM Press; 2000;pp 139–44
38. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Witt K, et al. Blindness and visual impairment in an American urban population: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:286–290
    • MEDLINE
39. Turnbull SB. People with Disabilities and the National Information Infrastructure (NII), in The Information Infrastructure: Reaching Society's Goals Report of the Information Infrastructure Task Force Committee on Applications and Technology. Washington: U.S.: Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology; 1994;
40. Vanderheiden G. Fundamental principles and priority setting for universal usability, in Proceedings of the Conference on Universal Usability. New York: ACM Press; 2000;pp 32–7
41. Votta M, Lloyd S. Introduction to Assistive Technology. New York: Lighthouse International; 2001;
42. Zick RG, Olsen J. Voice recognition software versus a traditional transcription service for physician charting in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19:295–298
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (28 KB)
    • CrossRef