Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 293-315 , July 2006

Systems for Staging the Amount of Optic Nerve Damage in Glaucoma: A Critical Review and New Material

References 

  1. — . The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126:498–505
  2. — . Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445–1455
  3. Airaksinen PJ, Drance SM, Douglas GR, et al. Neuroretinal rim areas and visual field indices in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;99:107–110
  4. Airaksinen PJ, Drance SM, Schulzer M. Neuroretinal rim area in early glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;99:1–4
  5. Anderson DR, Caprioli J. The optic nerve in glaucoma. In:  Jaeger E editors. Duanes Clinical Ophthalmology, Vol 3. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1995;chap 48
  6. Armaly MF. The optic cup in the normal eye. I. Cup width, depth, vessel displacement, ocular tension and outflow facility. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68:401–407
  7. Armaly MF, Krueger DE, Maunder L, et al. Biostatistical analysis of the collaborative glaucoma study. I. Summary report of the risk factors for glaucomatous visual-field defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:2163–2171
  8. Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H, et al. Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field defects. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series. 1977;14:75–83
  9. Azuara-Blanco A, Katz LJ, Spaeth GL, et al. Detection of changes of the optic disc in glaucomatous eyes: clinical examination and image analysis with the Topcon Imagenet system. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78:647–650
  10. Balazsi AG, Drance SM, Schulzer M, et al. Neuroretinal rim area in suspected glaucoma and early chronic open-angle glaucoma. Correlation with parameters of visual function. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:1011–1014
  11. Bayer A, Harasymowycz P, Henderer JD, et al. Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:758–763
  12. Becker B, Shaffer RN. Diagnosis and therapy of the glaucomas. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co; 1961;p 360
  13. Brusini P: Estimating glaucomatous anatomical damage by computerized automated perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;224(Suppl):28–9, 1997
  14. Brusini P. Clinical use of a new method for visual field damage classification in glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1996;6:402–407
  15. Caprioli J. Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:153–159
  16. Caprioli J. Correlation of visual function with optic nerve and nerve fiber layer structure in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989;33(Suppl):319–330
  17. Caprioli J, Miller JM. Videographic measurements of optic nerve topography in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:1294–1298
  18. Caprioli J, Miller JM. Correlation of structure and function in glaucoma. Quantitative measurements of disc and field. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:723–727
  19. Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Zuppardi E, et al. Reliability of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:190–195
  20. Chandler PA, Grant WM. Lectures on glaucoma. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1965;p 431
  21. Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, et al. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1492–1499
  22. Choplin NT, Lundy DC. The sensitivity and specificity of scanning laser polarimetry in the detection of glaucoma in a clinical setting. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:899–904
  23. Correnti AJ, Wollstein G, Price LL, et al. Comparison of optic nerve head assessment with a digital stereoscopic camera (discam), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and stereophotography. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1499–1505
  24. De Schweinitz GE. Diseases of the eye. A hand-book of ophthalmic practice for students and practitioners. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1893;pp 641
  25. Douglas GR, Drance SM, Schulzer M. A correlation of fields and discs in open angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 1974;9:391–398
  26. Drance SM. Correlation between optic disc changes and visual field defects in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1976;81:224–226
  27. Duke-Elder S, Jay B. Diseases of the lens and diseases of the vitreous; glaucoma and hypotony. In:  Duke-Elder S editors. System of Ophthalmology. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1969;pp v, xi
  28. Echelman DA, Shields MB. Optic nerve head imaging. In:  Jakobiec FA editors. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology: Clinical Practice. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1994;p. 1310–1329
  29. Eid TM, Spaeth GL, Bitterman A, et al. Rate and amount of visual loss in 102 patients with open-angle glaucoma followed up for at least 15 years. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:900–907
  30. Ervin JC, Lemij HG, Mills RP, et al. Clinician change detection viewing longitudinal stereophotographs compared to confocal scanning laser tomography in the LSU Experimental Glaucoma (LEG) Study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:467–481
  31. Feiner L, Piltz-Seymour JR Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. a summary of results to date. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003;14:106–111
  32. Feuer WJ, Parrish RK, Schiffman JC, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: reproducibility of cup/disk ratio measurements over time at an optic disc reading center. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:19–28
  33. Fuchs E, Duane A. Text-book of Ophthalmology. New York: D. Appleton and Co; 1892;p 788
  34. Gafner F, Goldmann H. [Experimental research on the connection of rising of ocular tension and disturbances of the visual field]. Ophthalmologica. 1955;130:357–377
  35. Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Quantitative evaluation of the optic nerve head in early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:352–361
  36. Girkin CA. Relationship between structure of optic nerve/nerve fiber layer and functional measurements in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:96–101
  37. Graham PA. Epidemiology of simple glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972;56:223–229
  38. Gramer E, Althaus G. [Quantification and progression of the visual field defect in glaucoma without hypertension, glaucoma simplex and pigmentary glaucoma. A clinical study with the Delta Program of the 201 Octopus perimeter]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1987;191:184–198
  39. Gramer E, Grehn F. A new unification hypothesis of glaucomas based in clinical studies in disc appearance in relation to the stage of visual field loss in different types of glaucoma. In:  Grehn F editors. Pathogenesis and Risk Factors of Glaucoma. Berlin, New York: Springer; 1999;p. 170–203
  40. Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:140–145
  41. Gupta N, Weinreb RN. New definitions of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1997;8:38–41
  42. Heijl A, Mölder H. Optic disc diameter influences the ability to detect glaucomatous disc damage. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1993;71:122–129
  43. Henderer JD, Liu C, Kesen M, et al. Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:44–48
  44. Hitchings RA, Anderton S. Identification of glaucomatous visual field defects from examination of monocular photographs of the optic disc. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983;67:822–825
  45. Hitchings RA, Spaeth GL. The optic disc in glaucoma. I: Classification. Br J Ophthalmol. 1976;60:778–785
  46. Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson DR. Clinical decisions in glaucoma. St Louis: CV Mosby Co; 1993;pp 52–61
  47. Hollows FC, Graham PA. Intra-ocular pressure, glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. Br J Ophthalmol. 1966;50:570–586
  48. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Courtright P, et al. Correlation between the visual field indices and Heidelberg retina tomograph parameters. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:78–82
  49. Johnson S, et al. Antonio Damasios theory of thinking faster and faster. Discover. 2004;25:44–49
  50. Jonas JB, Gründler AE. Correlation between mean visual field loss and morphometric optic disk variables in the open-angle glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:488–497
  51. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open-angle glaucoma. II. Correlation of the intrapapillary morphometric data to visual field indices. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226:531–538
  52. Jonas JB, Zäch FM, Gusek GC, et al. Pseudoglaucomatous physiologic large cups. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:137–144
  53. Kamal DS, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA, et al. Use of sequential Heidelberg retina tomograph images to identify changes at the optic disc in ocular hypertensive patients at risk of developing glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:993–998
  54. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Escano MF, et al. Evaluation of the glaucomatous damage on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. AM J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:513–520
  55. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:701–713discussion 829–30
  56. Kesen MR, Spaeth GL, Henderer JD, et al. The Heidelberg Retina Tomograph vs clinical impression in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:613–616
  57. Klein BE, Magli YL, Richie KA, et al. Quantitation of optic disc cupping. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:1654–1656
  58. Koozekanani D, Boyer KL, Roberts C. Tracking the optic nervehead in OCT video using dual eigenspaces and an adaptive vascular distribution model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22:1519–1536
  59. Lan YW, Henson DB, Kwartz AJ. The correlation between optic nerve head topographic measurements, peripapillary nerve fibre layer thickness, and visual field indices in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1135–1141
  60. Lee BL, Bathija R, Weinreb RN. The definition of normal-tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:366–371
  61. Lee KH, Park KH, Kim DM, et al. Relationship between optic nerve head parameters of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and visual field defects in primary open-angle glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol. 1996;10:24–28
  62. Leskea MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, et al. Factors for progression and glaucoma treatment: the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:102–106
  63. Lichter PR. Expectations from clinical trials: results of the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1371–1372
  64. Lichter PR. Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1976;74:532–572
  65. Lim CS, O'Brien C, Bolton NM. A simple clinical method to measure the optic disc size in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1996;5:241–245
  66. Lopes JF, Susanna R. Scanning laser polarimetry and progression of visual field defects after intraocular pressure increase. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1500–1501
  67. Mardin CY, Hothorn T, Peters A, et al. New glaucoma classification method based on standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters by bagging classification trees. J Glaucoma. 2003;12:340–346
  68. Marinchev VN, Nakhekian RI. [Effectiveness of isoglaucon after glaucoma operations]. Vestn Oftalmol. 1981;6:12–14
  69. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Comparison of scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:698–704
  70. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:827–837
  71. Meyer H. Diagrammatic notation and codification of: Diagrammatic notation and codification of the optic nerve excavations. Proc Ophthalmol Soc Sofr. 1970;18:23–24
  72. Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, et al. Ability of the Heidelberg retina tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucom. 1995;4:242–247
  73. Mistlberger A, Liebmann JM, Greenfield DS, et al. Assessment of optic disc anatomy and nerve fiber layer thickness in ocular hypertensive subjects with normal short-wavelength automated perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1362–1366
  74. Musch DC, Lichter PR, Guire KE, et al. The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:653–662
  75. Nangia V, Schwartz B. Measurement of optic disc area and its clinical relevance in open-angle glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1994;34:255–262
  76. Nesterov AP, Listopadova NA. [Classification of physiological and glaucomatous extraction of the optic disk]. Vestn Oftalmol. 1981;17–22
  77. Nicolela MT, Drance SM. Various glaucomatous optic nerve appearances: clinical correlations. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:640–649
  78. Nicolela MT, Martinez-Bello C, Morrison CA, et al. Scanning laser polarimetry in a selected group of patients with glaucoma and normal controls. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:845–854
  79. O'Connor DJ, Zeyen T, Caprioli J. Comparisons of methods to detect glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1498–1503
  80. Perkins ES, Phelps CD. Open angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, low-tension glaucoma, and refraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:1464–1467
  81. Pickard R. The alteration in size of the normal optic disc cup. Br J Ophthalmol. 1948;32:355–361
  82. Quigley HA. The pathogenesis of reversible cupping in congenital glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977;84:358–370
  83. Quigley HA, Hohman RM, Addicks EM, et al. Morphologic changes in the lamina cribrosa correlated with neural loss in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;95:673–691
  84. Quigley HA, Katz J, Derick RJ, et al. An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:19–28
  85. Read RM, Spaeth GL. The practical clinical appraisal of the optic disc in glaucoma: the natural history of cup progression and some specific disc-field correlations. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1974;78:OP255–74
  86. Richardson KT. Glaucoma and glaucoma suspects. In:  Richardson KT editors. Glaucoma: Conceptions of a Disease, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Therapy. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1978;p. 2–6
  87. Ritch R. Exfoliation syndrome and occludable angles. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1994;92:845–944
  88. Sampaolesi R, Sampaolesi JR. The glaucomatous optic nerve staging system with confocal tomography. In:  Kwasniewska S editors. Lasers in Ophthalmology—Basic, Diagnostics and Surgical Aspects. ed 1. The Hague: Kugler; 2003;p. 285–301
  89. Schottenstein EM. Intraocular pressure and tonometry. In:  Krupin T,  Ritch R,  Shields MB editor. The Glaucomas. ed 2. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1996;p. 407–428
  90. Schuman JS, Wollstein G, Farra T, et al. Comparison of optic nerve head measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:504–512
  91. Schwartz B. New techniques for the examination of the optic disc and their clinical application. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1976;81:227–235
  92. Schwartz B. Cupping and pallor of the optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973;89:272–277
  93. Shields MB. The challenge of screening for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:793–795
  94. Shiose Y. [Quantitative analysis of “optic cup” and its clinical application. III. A new diagnostic criterion for glaucoma using “quantitative disc pattern” (Shiose) (author's transl)]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1975;79:445–461
  95. Shiose Y, Kitazawa Y, Tsukahara S, et al. Epidemiology of glaucoma in Japan—a nationwide glaucoma survey. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1991;35:133–155
  96. Sihota R, Gulati V, Saxena R, et al. Correlation between confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and scanning laser polarimetry in open angle glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2003;13:266–275
  97. Soliman MA, Van Den Berg TJ, Ismaeil AA, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: relationship between optical coherence tomography and red-free photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:187–195
  98. Sommer A, Pollack I, Maumenee AE. Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss. I. Methods and progressive changes in disc morphology. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:1444–1448
  99. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1090–1095
  100. Spaeth GL. A new management system for glaucoma based on improvement of the appearance of the optic disc or visual field. Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1988;85:614–619
  101. Spaeth GL. Morphological damage of the optic nerve. In:  Richardson KT editors. Glaucoma: Conceptions of a Disease, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Therapy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1978;p. 138–156
  102. Spaeth GL: Appearances of the optic disc in glaucoma: a pathogenetic classification, in Trans Acad Ophthalmol: Symposium on Glaucoma. St. Louis, CV Mosby, 1981
  103. Spaeth GL. Primary open angle glaucoma. In:  Rhee DJ editors. Glaucoma Color Atlas and Synopsis of Clinical Ophthalmology. vol. 5:McGraw-Hill Professional; 2003;p. 204–229
  104. Spaeth GL, Henderer J, Liu C, et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:181–185discussion 185–6
  105. Spaeth GL, Henderer J, Steinmann W. The disc damage likelihood scale: its use in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Highlights Ophthalmol. 2003;31:4–16
  106. Spaeth GL, Hwang S, Gomes M. Disc damage as a prognostic and therapeutic consideration in the management of patients with glaucoma. In:  Grehn F editors. Pathogenesis and risk factors of glaucoma. Berlin, New York: Springer; 1999;p. 135–144
  107. Stoerig P. The neuroanatomy of phenomenal vision: a psychological perspective. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2001;929:176–194
  108. Sugar HS. The Glaucomas. New York: Hoeber-Harper; 1957;ed 2, p 516
  109. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:350–356
  110. Varma R, Spaeth GL, Steinmann WC, et al. Agreement between clinicians and an image analyzer in estimating cup-to-disc ratios. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:526–529
  111. Vermeer KA, Vos FM, Lemij HG, et al. Detecting glaucomatous wedge shaped defects in polarimetric images. Med Image Anal. 2003;7:503–511
  112. Von Jaeger E: Ophthalmoskopischer Hand-atlas. Wien, Druck und Verlag der K.K. Hof und Staatsdruckerei, 1869, p 165
  113. Weinreb RN. Evaluating the retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma with scanning laser polarimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1403–1406
  114. Weinreb RN, Anton A. Glaucoma definition and classification. In:  Sparrow JM,  Easty DL editor. Oxford Textbook of Ophthalmology. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 1999;p. 642–646
  115. Wilensky JT, Podos SM, Becker B. Prognostic indicators in ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;91:200–202
  116. Williams ZY, Schuman JS, Gamell L, et al. Optical coherence tomography measurement of nerve fiber layer thickness and the likelihood of a visual field defect. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:538–546
  117. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Fontana L, et al. Identifying early glaucomatous changes. Comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2272–2277
  118. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557–1563
  119. Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC, et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:985–993
  120. Zangwill LM, de Souza Lima M, Weinreb RN. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy to detect glaucomatous optic neuropathy. In:  Schuman JS editors. Imaging in Glaucoma. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc; 1997;p. 45–58
  121. Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Berry CC, et al. The confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study: study design and baseline factors. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:219–227
  122. Zeyen TG, Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:62–65

 The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

PII: S0039-6257(06)00081-6

doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.04.008

Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 293-315 , July 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution