Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 42, Issue 4 , Pages 355-357, January 1998

On Focusing the Slit-Lamp: Part II. “The Fading-Slit Test”—Verifying the Ocular Setting

Abstract 

The focusing-rod test is considered the gold standard for determining the correct setting of the slit-lamp ocular rings. This method is, however, somewhat time-consuming, considering the time it often takes to locate a rod every time one switches between slit-lamps or slit-lamp–mounted lasers. In this article we present an alternative test, which we call the fading-slit test, that requires only a second to perform, does not involve additional equipment (such as a rod), and can be applied at any time during the slit-lamp examination. However, while the focusing-rod test determines what setting should be used, the fading slit test can verify only whether the current setting is indeed the correct one and, therefore, it is not a complete substitute for the focusing-rod test. The fading-slit test is performed as follows: while focusing on any approximately flat surface (even the center of the patient’s dome-shaped cornea would do) and using oblique illumination, gradually reduce the slit width until it disappears. Pay attention to whether the slit continuously thins, reaching a hairline width prior to its disappearance or, alternatively, whether, just before disappearance, the slit remains somewhat wide, gradually fading away, instead of thinning away. In the former case the ocular setting is correct; in the latter case it is incorrect. (Surv Ophthalmol 42:355–357, 1998.

Keywords: ametropia • focusing-rod • refraction • slit-lamp

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0039-6257(97)00126-4

doi:10.1016/S0039-6257(97)00126-4

Survey of Ophthalmology
Volume 42, Issue 4 , Pages 355-357, January 1998