<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com//inpress?rss=yes"><title>Survey of Ophthalmology - Articles in Press</title><description>Survey of Ophthalmology RSS feed: Articles in Press. 
 Survey of Ophthalmology  is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major 
review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance.  Survey  also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.

 
 
To view video files associated 
with published manuscripts, click

  here .</description><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com//inpress?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0039-6257</prism:issn><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-18</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002598/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002689/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002690/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS003962570900157X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002628/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002057/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002069/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709001878/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709001611/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS003962570900160X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709001581/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002598/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Can't Hear, Can't See, and Too Sore to Play - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002598/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: A 52-year-old man developed transient, migratory polyarthralgias in the presence of hearing loss. He then developed persistent leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. His initial transient, bilateral visual obscurations happened in context with bilateral disk edema and an enlarged blind spot. Visual symptoms progressed to vision loss and multiple branch retinal artery occlusions. It was not until later in the disease progression that gastrointestinal symptoms occurred. Electron microscopy of duodenal biopsies confirmed a diagnosis of Whipple disease.</description><dc:title>Can't Hear, Can't See, and Too Sore to Play - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Ryan A. Scheurer, Gregory S. Kosmorsky, Gary S. Hoffman, Carol Farver, Michael S. Lee, Dean M. Cestari</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.09.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Survey of Ophthalmology (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-18</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL CHALLENGES</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002689/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Techniques of Upper Eyelid Reconstruction - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002689/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Reconstruction of the upper eyelid is one of the greatest challenges facing the orbitofacial surgeon. This comprehensive review outlines the principles of reconstruction and the range of techniques available. Methods of assessing upper eyelid defects are discussed, and an algorithm for reconstruction based on defect size and lamellar involvement is given. The review contains numerous detailed examples of reconstructive techniques, including secondary intention healing, local flaps, distal flaps, simple and composite grafts, occlusive and non-occlusive methods, and canthal fixation. Eyebrow and eyelash reconstruction is also covered.</description><dc:title>Techniques of Upper Eyelid Reconstruction - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Ana M.S. Morley, Jean-Louis deSousa, Dinesh Selva, Raman Malhotra</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.10.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Survey of Ophthalmology (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-18</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>DIAGNOSTIC AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUES</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002690/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Drug-induced Optic Neuropathy—TB or Not TB - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002690/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Autosomal dominant optic atrophy is an inherited optic neuropathy manifesting with variable penetrance and expressivity. Other genetic and environmental factors are postulated to contribute to more marked visual loss in some affected individuals. Optic neuropathy is also a known adverse effect of ethambutol therapy for tuberculosis. This case report demonstrates an atypical presentation of ethambutol toxicity, with progressive profound loss of vision despite drug cessation. A subsequent diagnosis of autosomal dominant optic atrophy was made when the proband's sons presented with mild visual disturbances and color vision defects, confirmed with electrophysiology and OPA1 gene mutational analysis. This case emphasizes the importance of avoiding potentially neurotoxic therapy in predisposed individuals and the influence of environmental factors in patients with inherited optic neuropathies.</description><dc:title>Drug-induced Optic Neuropathy—TB or Not TB - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Monika Pradhan, Dianne Sharp, Stephen Best, Andrea Vincent, Michael Vaphiades</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.10.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Survey of Ophthalmology (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-18</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL CHALLENGES</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS003962570900157X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Performance-based Measures of Visual Function - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS003962570900157X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Review of the substantial literature reveals that the importance of performance-based measures of visual function is becoming increasingly recognized. Alone, or in combination with other assessment modalities, they have been shown to provide a reliable and valid means of evaluating visual ability. Further, they have been demonstrated to predict outcomes better than self-report or clinical measures alone.</description><dc:title>Performance-based Measures of Visual Function - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Kevin J. Warrian, Undraa Altangerel, George L. Spaeth</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.06.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Survey of Ophthalmology (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-13</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-13</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>MAJOR REVIEW</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002628/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Orbital Involvement in Castleman Disease - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002628/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Castleman disease is a quite uncommon lymphoproliferative disorder usually occurring in the lymph nodes. Rarely, Castleman disease develops in an extranodal anatomic location. We report on the first biopsy-proven case of multicentric plasma cell type of Castleman disease involving the orbital areas in a human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8)-unassociated/ human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seronegative 70-year-old man suffering from Parkinson disease. The diagnosis was established on the basis of morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular findings of a lymph node and orbital soft tissue biopsy. We additionally provide a review of all previously published cases of Castleman disease with an orbital involvement, discussing the distinctive characteristics and potential associations with regard to their counterparts at other sites. Although Castleman disease involving the orbit is an exceptionally rare occurrence that may present initially with ocular signs and symptoms, this should be included in the complete differential diagnosis of orbital mass lesion.</description><dc:title>Orbital Involvement in Castleman Disease - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Ioannis Venizelos, Thomas G. Papathomas, Maria Papathanasiou, Angeliki Cheva, Vasilia Garypidou, Sarah Coupland</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.09.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>Survey of Ophthalmology (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-13</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-13</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL PATHOLOGIC REVIEWS</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002057/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Blue-blocking IOLs Decrease Photoreception without Providing Significant Photoprotection - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002057/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Violet and blue light are responsible for 45% of scotopic, 67% of melanopsin, 83% of human circadian (melatonin suppression) and 94% of S-cone photoreception in pseudophakic eyes (isoilluminance source). Yellow chromophores in blue-blocking intraocular lenses (IOLs) eliminate between 43 and 57% of violet and blue light between 400 and 500 nm, depending on their dioptric power. This restriction adversely affects pseudophakic photopic luminance contrast, photopic S-cone foveal threshold, mesopic contrast acuity, scotopic short-wavelength sensitivity and circadian photoreception. Yellow IOL chromophores provide no tangible clinical benefits in exchange for the photoreception losses they cause. They fail to decrease disability glare or improve contrast sensitivity. Most epidemiological evidence shows that environmental light exposure and cataract surgery are not significant risk factors for the progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Thus, the use of blue-blocking IOLs is not evidence-based medicine. Most AMD occurs in phakic adults over 60 years of age, despite crystalline lens photoprotection far greater than that of blue-blocking IOLs. Therefore, if light does play some role in the pathogenesis of AMD, then 1) senescent crystalline lenses do not prevent it, so neither can blue-blocking IOLs that offer far less photoprotection, and 2) all pseudophakes should wear sunglasses in bright environments. Pseudophakes have the freedom to remove their sunglasses for optimal photoreception whenever they choose to do so, provided that they are not encumbered permanently by yellow IOL chromophores. In essence, yellow chromophores are placebos for prevention of AMD that permanently restrict a pseudophake's dim light and circadian photoreception at ages when they are needed most. If yellow IOLs had been the standard of care, then colorless UV-blocking IOLs could be advocated now as “premium” IOLs because they offer dim light and circadian photoreception roughly 15–20 years more youthful than blue-blocking IOLs.</description><dc:title>Blue-blocking IOLs Decrease Photoreception without Providing Significant Photoprotection - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Martin A. Mainster, Patricia L. Turner</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.07.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Survey of Ophthalmology (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-11-02</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-11-02</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>VIEWPOINTS</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002069/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Blue-Blocking IOLs: A Complete Review of the Literature - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709002069/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Intraocular lenses (IOLs) that block both ultraviolet and blue wavelength light (&lt;500 nm) were introduced in the 1990s. Since then, the potential benefits and harm from blocking blue light has been debated. We report the results of a complete review of all peer-reviewed published studies regarding the impact of blocking the transmission of blue light. Fifty-six published reports on subjects related to blue-blocking lenses including sleep disturbance, visual outcomes, cataract surgery, lens transmittance, sunlight exposure, and macular disease were found in peer reviewed journals from 1962 to 2009. Eleven reports specifically compared visual outcomes between blue-blocking IOLs and non-blue-locking IOLs. Of these, 10 independent studies (10/11, 91%) concluded that there are no significant effects of blue-blocking IOLs on various meters of visual performance including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color perception, and photopic, mesopic, and scotopic sensitivities. Only one group of authors reported that the use of blue-blocking IOLs may have detrimental effects on scotopic vision and circadian rhythms. However, the actual clinical significance of these potential negative effects on scotopic vision and on sleep patterns is uncertain. The benefits of blocking the transmission of blue light to the macula and the relationship between progression of age-related macular degeneration remain unclear. However, the published studies clearly state that the use of blue-blocking IOLs is not detrimental in visual acuity, color perception, and contrast sensitivity. The reported potential negative effects on scotopic vision and sleep disturbance appear to be minimal and may not be clinically relevant.</description><dc:title>Blue-Blocking IOLs: A Complete Review of the Literature - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Bonnie An Henderson, Kelly Jun Grimes</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.07.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Survey of Ophthalmology (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-10-30</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-10-30</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>VIEWPOINTS</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709001878/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Glazed (Vision) and Confused - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709001878/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: A 60-year-old man presented with vitritis and optic neuropathy in the setting of headaches and behavioral changes. MRI brain revealed bilateral temporal lobe inflammation consistent with limbic encephalitis. He was subsequently diagnosed with small cell lung cancer with a paraneoplastic syndrome characterized by CRMP5 IgG as a cause of his symptoms. His visual symptoms improved markedly after anti-inflammatory therapy and his cognitive symptoms were mildly better following systemic chemotherapy. The clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and therapy of CRMP5 associated paraneoplastic syndromes are discussed.</description><dc:title>Glazed (Vision) and Confused - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Heather E. Moss, Grant T. Liu, Josep Dalmau</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.03.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>Survey of Ophthalmology (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-10-05</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL CHALLENGES</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709001611/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Optics of Aphakic and Pseudophakic Eyes in Childhood - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709001611/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The growth of the eye results in a myopic shift in aphakic and pseudophakic eyes during childhood. Cataract surgery after the age of 6 months, with or without lens implantation, appears to have little effect on the rate of refractive growth. Most children with pseudophakia have a large amount of myopic shift. This myopic shift is greatest in children with surgery at younger ages. It is also greater in eyes with high-power intraocular lenses due to an optical phenomenon analogous to the effect of vertex distance. The amount of myopic shift and the variance in rate of refractive growth can be predicted using an empiric, logarithmic model. We describe a revision of this logarithmic model to extend it patients with surgery before 3 months of age. We also analyze the variance in the rate of refractive growth, based on data from pseudophakic children with the longest follow-up in proportion to age.</description><dc:title>The Optics of Aphakic and Pseudophakic Eyes in Childhood - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Scott K. McClatchey, Elizabeth M. Hofmeister</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.07.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Survey of Ophthalmology (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-29</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-29</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REFRACTIONS AND REFLECTIONS</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS003962570900160X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Ludwik Zamenhof: A Major Contributor to World Culture, on the 150th Anniversary of His Birth - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS003962570900160X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: More than 200 universal languages have been proposed to replace the nearly 3,000 existing languages. Esperanto, developed by the Polish-Jewish ophthalmologist Ludwik Zamenhof in 1887, became the most widely used artificial language of the 20th century. It is estimated that between one million and 15 million people in the world can speak or read Esperanto. Zamenhof was nominated 14 times for the Nobel Peace Prize, and also received the French Legion of Honor, and the Medal of Isabelle of Spain the Catholic. Ludwik Zamenhof started his professional training in ophthalmology at the Jewish Hospital in Warsaw, later spent several months in Vienna, and finally started a private ophthalmology practice in Warsaw, where he remained for most of his life. His son Adam was an associate professor of ophthalmology at the University of Warsaw and head of ophthalmology in the Jewish Hospital in Czyste, the biggest and most modern hospital in Warsaw at that time. Some lesser known aspects of Zamenhof's life and work drawn from the original 19th century Russian and 20th century Esperanto documents are described.</description><dc:title>Ludwik Zamenhof: A Major Contributor to World Culture, on the 150th Anniversary of His Birth - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Andrzej Grzybowski</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.06.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Survey of Ophthalmology (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-28</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>REMEMBRANCES OF THINGS PAST</prism:section></item><item rdf:about="http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709001581/abstract?rss=yes"><title>A Pregnant Pause - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.surveyophthalmol.com/article/PIIS0039625709001581/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: A 23-year-old pregnant woman presented with a rapidly progressive unilateral optic neuropathy. The evaluation was complicated by her being pregnant and the issues surrounding the evaluation and management of the pregnant patient with a neuro-ophthalmic finding is discussed. Eventually an orbital apex lesion was found and proved to be an orbital schwannoma. Rapid growth of an orbital schwannoma should be included in the differential diagnosis of progressive visual loss in a pregnant patient.</description><dc:title>A Pregnant Pause - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Emily S. Birkholz, Andrew G. Lee, Jeffrey A. Nerad, Katherine A. Lane, Jurij R. Bilyk</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.03.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Survey of Ophthalmology (2009)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-25</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Survey of Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-25</prism:publicationDate><prism:section>CLINICAL CHALLENGES</prism:section></item></rdf:RDF>