Intraocular Lens Confusions: A Preventable “Never Event”—The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital Protocol

      Abstract

      Intraocular lens (IOL) confusions and errors are among the most common postoperative adverse events. Errors may occur at any stage from the decision to operate to the insertion of the IOL. The most common errors occur during IOL selection pre-operative preparation (anaesthesia given before recognition that the intended IOL is not available), or intraoperatively (wrong IOL implanted because of confusion in the operating room). We review the mechanisms of errors reported in the literature and describe the experience at The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital. We also describe the implementation of an error-detection protocol and provide qualitative data on its performance.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Survey of Ophthalmology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ali N.
        A decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology.
        BMC Ophthalmol. 2007; 7: 20
        • Ali N.
        • Little B.C.
        Causes of cataract surgery malpractice claims in England 1995–2008.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2011; 95: 490-492
        • American Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America
        Kohn L. Corrigan J. Donaldson M. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health Care System. National Academy Press, Washington, DC1999
        • Benn J.
        • Koutantji M.
        • Wallace L.
        • et al.
        Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2009; 18: 11-21
        • Cima R.R.
        • Kollengode A.
        • Garnatz J.
        • et al.
        Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 80-87
        • Clarke J.R.
        • Johnston J.
        • Finley E.D.
        Getting surgery right.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 246 (discussion 405): 395-403
        • Eleftheriadis H.
        • Marcantonio J.
        • Duncan G.
        • et al.
        Interlenticular opacification in piggyback AcrySof intraocular lenses: explantation technique and laboratory investigations.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85: 830-836
        • Gawande A.
        The Checklist Manifesto. How to Get Things Right.
        ed 1. Profile Books Ltd, London2010
        • Gawande A.A.
        • Studdert D.M.
        • Orav E.J.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery.
        N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 229-235
        • Gayton J.L.
        • Van der Karr M.
        • Sanders V.
        Neodymium:YAG treatment of interlenticular opacification in a secondary piggyback case.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27: 1511-1513
        • Habot-Wilner Z.
        • Sachs D.
        • Cahane M.
        • et al.
        Refractive results with secondary piggyback implantation to correct pseudophakic refractive errors.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31: 2101-2103
        • Haynes A.B.
        • Weiser T.G.
        • Berry W.R.
        • et al.
        A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 491-499
        • Holladay J.T.
        Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997; 23: 1356-1370
        • Hsiang J.
        Wrong-level surgery: a unique problem in spine surgery.
        Surg Neurol Int. 2011; 2: 47
        • Jin G.J.
        • Merkley K.H.
        • Crandall A.S.
        • et al.
        Laser in situ keratomileusis versus lens-based surgery for correcting residual refractive error after cataract surgery.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34: 562-569
        • Kachalia A.
        • Kaufman S.R.
        • Boothman R.
        • et al.
        Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program.
        Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153: 213-221
        • Keatings M.
        • Martin M.
        • McCallum A.
        • et al.
        Medical errors: understanding the parent's perspective.
        Pediatr Clin North Am. 2006; 53: 1079-1089
        • Kelly S.P.
        • Astbury N.J.
        Patient safety in cataract surgery.
        Eye (Lond). 2006; 20: 275-282
        • Kelly S.P.
        • Jalil A.
        Wrong intraocular lens implant; learning from reported patient safety incidents.
        Eye (Lond). 2011; 25: 730-734
        • Kingston M.J.
        • Evans S.M.
        • Smith B.J.
        • et al.
        Attitudes of doctors and nurses towards incident reporting: a qualitative analysis.
        Med J Aust. 2004; 181: 36-39
        • Kreckler S.
        • Catchpole K.
        • McCulloch P.
        • et al.
        Factors influencing incident reporting in surgical care.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2009; 18: 116-120
        • Kwaan M.R.
        • Studdert D.M.
        • Zinner M.J.
        • et al.
        Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery.
        Arch Surg. 2006; 141 (discussion 7–8): 353-357
        • Lawton R.
        • Parker D.
        Barriers to incident reporting in a healthcare system.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2002; 11: 15-18
        • Lee A.C.
        • Qazi M.A.
        • Pepose J.S.
        Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation.
        Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008; 19: 13-17
        • Lincourt A.E.
        • Harrell A.
        • Cristiano J.
        • et al.
        Retained foreign bodies after surgery.
        J Surg Res. 2007; 138: 170-174
        • Mahajan R.P.
        Critical incident reporting and learning.
        Br J Anaesth. 2010; 105: 69-75
        • Michaels R.K.
        • Makary M.A.
        • Dahab Y.
        • et al.
        Achieving the National Quality Forum's “Never Events”: prevention of wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong patient operations.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 526-532
        • Neily J.
        • Mills P.D.
        • Eldridge N.
        • et al.
        Incorrect Surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room: a follow–up report.
        Arch Surg. 2011; 146: 1235-1239
        • Neily J.
        • Mills P.D.
        • Eldridge N.
        • Dunn
        • et al.
        Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room.
        Arch Surg. 2009; 144: 1028-1034
        • Neily J.
        • Mills P.D.
        • Young-Xu Y.
        • et al.
        Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality.
        JAMA. 2010; 304: 1693-1700
        • Panel P.
        • Cabarrot P.
        [Do we need a surgical safety checklist?].
        J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2010; 39: 362-370
        • Panesar S.S.
        • Carson-Stevens A.
        • Fitzgerald J.E.
        • et al.
        The WHO surgical safety checklist—junior doctors as agents for change.
        Int J Surg. 2010; 8: 414-416
        • Reason J.
        Safety in the operating theatre—Part 2: human error and organisational failure.
        Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 1995; 6: 121-126
        • Rogers Jr., S.O.
        • Gawande A.A.
        • Kwaan M.
        • et al.
        Analysis of surgical errors in closed malpractice claims at 4 liability insurers.
        Surgery. 2006; 140: 25-33
        • Sari A.B.
        • Sheldon T.A.
        • Cracknell A.
        • et al.
        Sensitivity of routine system for reporting patient safety incidents in an NHS hospital: retrospective patient case note review.
        BMJ. 2007; 334: 79
        • Seiden S.C.
        • Barach P.
        Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events: are they preventable?.
        Arch Surg. 2006; 141: 931-939
        • Simon J.W.
        Preventing surgical confusions in ophthalmology (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).
        Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 105: 513-529
        • Simon J.W.
        • Ngo Y.
        • Khan S.
        • et al.
        Surgical confusions in ophthalmology.
        Arch Ophthalmol. 2007; 125: 1515-1522
        • Soar J.
        • Peyton J.
        • Leonard M.
        • et al.
        Surgical safety checklists.
        BMJ. 2009; 338: b220
        • Taleb N.N.
        The Black Swan.
        ed 1. Random House, New York2007

      Other Cited Material

      1. Safe surgery saves lives. The second global patient safety challenge.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
      2. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
        (Facts about the Universal Protocol. Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
      3. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
        (Facts about the Universal Protocol. Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
      4. Veterans Health Administration. Ensuring correct surgery and invasive procedures. VHA Directive 2004–28. 25 July 2004. Available at www.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=1106. Accessed 15 October 2011.

        • World Alliance for Patient Safety
        The second global patient safety challenge: safe surgery saves lives.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
        • World Alliance for Patient Safety
        The second global patient safety challenge: safe surgery saves lives.
        (Accessed 15 October 2011)
      5. Defence update. MDA National. Winter 2009.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
        • World Health Organization
        Safe surgery saves lives. WHO Newsletter December 2010.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
        • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare
        Ensuring correct patient, correct site, correct procedure protocol for surgery: review of implementation and proposals for action.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
        • The National Patient Safety Agency
        WHO Surgical safety checklist.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
        • Coco Ballantyne
        Can a simple checklist prevent surgical errors? Scientific American News Blog.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
        • Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
        Help prevent errors in your care for surgical patients.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
        • UK Department of Health
        Expanding the list of “never events”.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
      6. The National Patient Safety Agency. Never events.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
      7. A Joint Statement of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses and the American Association of Eye and Ear Hospitals. Patient Safety Bulletin Number 2: Minimizing wrong IOL placement.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
        • National Patient Safety Agency
        WHO surgical safety checklist: for cataract surgery only.
        (Available at) (Accessed 15 October 2011)
        • Fowler T.B.
        • Fischer M.J.
        Rare events: the unrecognized threat.
        (Available at) (Accessed 26 October 2011)