Clinical decision-making: heuristics and cognitive biases for the ophthalmologist

      Abstract

      Diagnostic errors have a significant impact on health care outcomes and patient care. The underlying causes and development of diagnostic error are complex with flaws in health care systems, as well as human error, playing a role. Cognitive biases and a failure of decision-making shortcuts (heuristics) are human factors that can compromise the diagnostic process. We describe these mechanisms, their role with the clinician, and provide clinical scenarios to highlight the various points at which biases may emerge. We discuss strategies to modify the development and influence of these processes and the vulnerability of heuristics to provide insight and improve clinical outcomes.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Survey of Ophthalmology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Balogh E.P.
        • Miller B.T.
        • Ball J.R.
        Improving diagnosis in health care.
        The National Academies Press. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC2015
        • Cohen J.M.
        • Burgin S.
        Cognitive biases in clinical decision making: A primer for the practicing dermatologist.
        JAMA Dermatol. 2016; 152: 253-254
        • Croskerry P.
        Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9: 1184-1204
        • Croskerry P.
        The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them.
        Acad Med. 2003; 78: 775-780
        • Frankel J.
        Maloccurrence in oculoplastic surgery related to the managed care environment.
        Surv Ophthalmol. 2003; 48: 362-365
        • Graber M.
        • Gordon R.
        • Franklin N.
        Reducing diagnostic errors in medicine: what’s the goal?.
        Acad Med. 2002; 77: 981-992
        • Harvey N.
        Use of heuristics: Insights from forecasting research.
        Think Reason. 2007; 13: 5-24
        • Hillson T.R.
        • Harvey J.T.
        • Hurwitz J.J.
        • Liu E.
        • Oestreicher J.H.
        • Pashby R.C.
        Sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of periocular lesions by oculoplastic surgeons.
        Can J Ophthalmol. 1998; 33: 377-383
        • Kahneman D.
        • Shane F.
        Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment.
        in: Thomas G. Dale G. Daniel K. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge2002: 49-81
        • Makary M.A.
        • Daniel M.
        Medical error – the third leading cause of death in the US.
        BMJ. 2016; 353: i2139
        • Nendaz M.
        • Perrier A.
        Diagnostic errors and flaws in clinical reasoning: mechanisms and prevention in practice.
        Swiss Med Wkly. 2012; 142: w13706